Wikis and Social Networking Sites in Educational World

In this digital era, technology is continually evolving. Years later in 2004, Web 2.0 tools such as wikis and social networking sites (Facebook, MySpace, Twitter etc) have skyrocketed in the number of users. Then, most of the users are dominated by the students from all over the world. Therefore, nowadays it becomes an issue in the educational world.

A wiki is a communal, subject-specific Web site where users are free to add and/or edit content. When it comes to Internet-based collaboration, there’s nothing easier to use. In schools, wikis enable groups of students, parents, teachers, or all of them to gather content and share written work. While social networking site are often called “social content-sharing sites” where members create profiles, network, and share opinions, photos, and audio-visual content. 

When wikis and social networking sites are integrated into classroom, does not mean that it will automatically engage students in learning. Planning for integration requires rethinking teaching strategies and techniques to take advantage of their full potential. There are two major pointsthat highlighted in this essay. First are collaborative projects. This technology tool is ideal for project-based learning, cross curricular projects in middle school teams, and thematic units. For example, exhibition orfair projects which could be set up for middle or high school students to brainstorm ideas for and plan the projects. Initially it would mostly be brainstorming, posting ideas and information to back them up with text, images or video. Another example is collaborative textbooks and literature circles.Instead of sharing their thoughts on paper, they could post them to the wikis or social networking sites, respond to their peers’ thoughts or questions and best of all preserve this work for the next class to review at some time during their exploration of the same novel.

The second isonline resources for classroom use. A list of websites that provided appropriate information related to subject content is provided by the teacher for student use during the school year. It is possible to create and postclass notes, parental and student communication, handouts, course syllabus, course links and resource notes, school or class calendar, teacher information page, school newspaper, and platform for peer review of student work.

However, in 2006, Canole, de Laat, Dillon, and Darby reported student frustrations were attributed to the Web 2.0 applications being misused or to the instructor failing to provide appropriate support for the technology itself. There are some inconsistencies in positive feedback regarding the use of Web 2.0 technologies especially wikis and social networking sites. These inconsistencies were related to technical issues, instructors managing group work, and student expectations of how the instruction should be delivered. Therefore, these tools and practices should lead to pedagogical innovations in education. Then, ambiguity must be reduced so students are aware of what is expected in the use of these technologies and instructors know how to best utilize them.

These tools have changed the way we interact with each other both socially and educationally. Public schools and universities are exploring the use of these emerging tools to increase the effectiveness of instruction. The first step in this transition is encouraging teachers to try the new technology and providing support as they struggle to learn and understand how to use it. Once teachers are comfortable with the technology, they are free to integrate the use of social software into their classes creatively. Use of current software helps to prepare the next generation of students to be effective 21st century learners which will lead to a better educational world. 

Wikipedia: Reliability in Collaboration

“Remember, since you’re doing an academic writing especially on research, you are not allowed to use Wikipedia as one of your citation or references!” Have you ever heard those sentences? Yes! I guarantee that if you’re a scholars or learners that sentence is familiar. Then , what’s wrong with Wikipedia? Why it is restricted or discredited?

     Long time ago, BW (Before Wikipedia), most people either went to the library or collected expensive hardbound copies of the Encyclopedia Britannica. On January 15, 2001, Jimmy Walles and Larry Sanger launched Wikipedia officially. The two were working on an online encyclopedia using only expert-written articles called Nupedia, and found the process to be extremely slow. One of the employees on the encyclopedia suggested using the new wiki technology to create a “feeder” of information to the project. Soon the wiki articles overtook the Nupedia work. Then, Wales and Sanger decided to create Wikipedia to distinguish between the expert-written Nupedia and the open sourced, public driven, collaborative edited Wikipedia. Since its inception, the question of whether the site is a reliable resource or not has been debated. Therefore, since it is debatable, some of college and university choose to warn students not to use Wikipedia as a reference or citation.

     Moreover, as Wikipedia uses a collaborative editing process, questions of the sites reliability will be raised. Nonetheless, the site continues to grow. Again, according to their own website, Wikipedia has now more than “15 million freely useable articles in over two hundred languages worldwide, and content from a million registered user accounts and countless anonymous contributors.” As of the date of the publication of this article, Wikipedia has now more than 3.333 million English language articles. And as the site grows, attitudes toward the reliable and usefulness of the encyclopedia has changed. In 2007, the Chronicle of Higher Education published an article written by Cathy Davidson, Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies and English at Duke University, in which she asserts that Wikipedia should be used to teach students about the concepts of reliability and credibility.

     It could be argued that by Wikipedia highlighting the above articles they are guilty of self-referencing. Nonetheless, there is a general consensus forming on to how one should use Wikipedia as a resource. Most educators agree, Wikipedia can be an extremely useful tool. However, when reading Wikipedia, one should always check the sources cited in the article. Wikipedia articles are useful in providing general background on the subject you are studying. Moreover, as you can see when you’re looking for some information in the search engine like Google, Yahoo or Bing, you’ll find that Wikipedia is positioned in the first line, on the top of the search result, for almost every kind of information! Wikipedia is affordable resources.

     And so, in regards to Wikipedia’s reliability, it can be argued that the site is reliable in providing researchers and students a guiding light, or a “starting point,” into the subject. But, because of its collaborative editing process, Wikipedia should not be considered a carefully vetted source, unless you are writing about the Wikipedia (organization) itself. Then, directly quoting the site and its founders just might be appropriate. After all, who would know the history of Wikipedia better than Wikipedia? :D